<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 15 Feb 2012 06:00:46 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Creative Writings and Orations</title><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-US</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.11.81 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Proper Points of Information</title><category>Robert's Rules</category><dc:creator>Brother Schwegler</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:39:05 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2011/9/19/proper-points-of-information.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:12913044</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>I will no longer entertain Points of Information in the way our society  has for the past few semesters. Such Incidental Motions  have been abused in recent meetings. If we were able to follow the rules at least  moderately close, I would be alright with allowing the occasional  &#8220;pinchy&#8221; question. As things rest, for now, I strongly discourage such  things. This post will serve as a permanent resource for members that want to know exactly how requests for information shoudl be handled.<br /> <br />Here is a helpful chart of motions:<br /><a href="http://www.robertsrules.org/motions.htm" target="_blank">http://www.robertsrules.org/motions.htm</a><br /><br />Here is the full text of Robert&#8217;s Rules online:<br /><a href="http://www.robertsrules.org/rror--00.htm" target="_blank">http://www.robertsrules.org/rror&#8212;00.htm</a><br /> <br />Pay particular attention to the section on Incidental Motions:<br /><a href="http://www.robertsrules.org/rror-04.htm" target="_blank">http://www.robertsrules.org/rror-04.htm</a><br /><br />From Article IV, Section 27b of Robert&#8217;s Rules of Order:<br /> <em>&#8220;Request for Information</em>. A request for   information relating to the pending business is treated just as a parliamentary   inquiry, and has the same privileges. The inquirer rises and says, &#8220;Mr.   Chairman, I rise for information,&#8221; or, &#8220;I rise to a point of   information,&#8221; whereupon the chair directs him to state the point upon which   he desires information, and the procedure continues as in case of a   parliamentary inquiry. If the information is desired of the speaker, instead of   the chair, the inquirer upon rising says, &#8220;Mr. Chairman, I should like to   ask the gentleman a question.&#8221; The chairman inquires if the speaker is   willing to be interrupted, and if he consents, he directs the inquirer to   proceed. The inquirer then asks the question through the chair, thus, &#8220;Mr.   Chairman, I should like to ask the gentleman,&#8221; etc. The reply is made in   the same way, as it is not in order for members to address one another in the   assembly. While each speaker addresses the chair, the chair remains silent   during the conversation. If the speaker consents to the interruption the time   consumed is taken out of his time.&#8221;﻿</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-12913044.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Mash-Up</title><dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 17:17:04 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2010/4/22/mash-up.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:7416704</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><object height="81" width="100%"> <param name="movie" value="http://player.soundcloud.com/player.swf?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsoundcloud.com%2Fdj-dain%2Fdont-worry-im-yours-mashup"></param> <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param> <embed allowscriptaccess="always" height="81" src="http://player.soundcloud.com/player.swf?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsoundcloud.com%2Fdj-dain%2Fdont-worry-im-yours-mashup" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="100%"></embed> </object> <span><a href="http://soundcloud.com/dj-dain/dont-worry-im-yours-mashup">Don&#8217;t Worry, I&#8217;m Yours (Jason Mraz vs. Bobby McFerrin vs. Israel Kamakawiwo&#8217;ole)</a> by <a href="http://soundcloud.com/dj-dain">DJ Dain</a></span></p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-7416704.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Dream Job! Life as a Parliamentarian</title><dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 02:08:08 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2010/3/19/dream-job-life-as-a-parliamentarian.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:7073561</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Check out this<a href="http://www.slate.com/id/2248278/"> article on the life of a parliamentarian</a>.&nbsp; These people are grandfathered in to the role, and even then, there have only been four of them&#8230;ever.&nbsp; Talk about a dream job - running the senate based on parliamentary order!</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-7073561.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Does god exist? A novel approach:</title><dc:creator>Admin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:14:58 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2010/1/20/does-god-exist-a-novel-approach.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:6386448</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Check out NPR&#8217;s Fresh Air interviewing a novelist who tries her hand at answering the question of the existence of (a) god(s).&nbsp; A great way to get warmed up for next week&#8217;s debate, BIHR: god is a construct of Man!&nbsp;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=122766114&amp;ft=1&amp;f=13">Linkedylink</a></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="visibility: visible ! important;" src="http://media.npr.org/assets/artslife/books/2010/01/36-arguments/arguments200_custom.jpg?t=1264004497&amp;__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1264047620198" alt="" /></span></span></p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-6386448.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>acapella</title><category>Video</category><category>asian</category><category>gaga</category><dc:creator>Sister Rebecca Faulkner</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:19:45 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/12/10/acapella.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:6031421</guid><description><![CDATA[I have never seen such an insightful glimpse into this intellectual masterpiece.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/bW5czKqT05A&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/bW5czKqT05A&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-6031421.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>notes</title><category>Music</category><dc:creator>Sister Rebecca Faulkner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 19:57:42 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/12/2/notes.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:5971171</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/2009/nov/23/composer-fluid-piano-geoff-smith">This article </a>discusses a modified instrument created by Geoff Smith that he calls the &#8216;fluid piano.&#8217;&nbsp; Smith&#8217;s piano allows the musician to shift the notes that he plays to encompass notes found in eastern music.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/music/video/2009/nov/22/fluid-piano-classical-music">Here is a video</a> of the instrument and inventor.&nbsp; What do you think about having a fluid piano?&nbsp; Does it have a place in western orchestras?&nbsp; Does its versatility give the instrument higher aesthetic value?</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-5971171.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>A Nazi Christmas?</title><dc:creator>Sister Terry Bardagjy</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:29:47 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/11/18/a-nazi-christmas.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:5844176</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="visibility: visible ! important;" src="http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2009/11/17/article-0-07409EAA000005DC-682_634x430.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1258576451899" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>No, this isn&#8217;t a sequel to <em>The Producers</em>.&nbsp; Just a pinchie about the National Socialist Party.&nbsp; Many people assume that they were Christians, as had been most of the anti-Semites leading up to this time.&nbsp; But in fact, the National Socialists were secular, and Hitler had plans for establishing his own religion.&nbsp;</p>
<p>This made Christmas an interesting feat - check out<a href="http://www.eatmedaily.com/2009/11/have-a-very-nazi-christmas/"> this blog article</a> on how the National Socialists still celebrated the holiday</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-5844176.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Politics &amp; Languange</title><category>Books</category><category>butcher</category><category>english</category><category>tiptoe through the tulips</category><dc:creator>Sister Rebecca Faulkner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:37:02 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/11/11/politics-languange.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:5766882</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: left;">(i) Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used    to seeing in print.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">(ii) Never us a long word where a short one will do.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">(iii) If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">(iv) Never use the passive where you can use the active.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">(v) Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you    can think of an everyday English equivalent.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">(vi) Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">These rules sound elementary, and so they are, but they demand a deep change of attitude in anyone who has grown used to writing in the style now fashionable. One could keep all of them and still write bad English, but one could not write the kind of stuff that I quoted in those five specimens at the beginning of this article.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">I have not here been considering the literary use of language, but merely language    as an instrument for expressing and not for concealing or preventing thought.    Stuart Chase and others have come near to claiming that all abstract words are    meaningless, and have used this as a pretext for advocating a kind of political    quietism. Since you don&#8217;t know what Fascism is, how can you struggle against    Fascism? One need not swallow such absurdities as this, but one ought to recognize    that the present political chaos is connected with the decay of language, and    that one can probably bring about some improvement by starting at the verbal    end. If you simplify your English, you are freed from the worst follies of orthodoxy.    You cannot speak any of the necessary dialects, and when you make a stupid remark    its stupidity will be obvious, even to yourself. Political language &#8212; and with    variations this is true of all political parties, from Conservatives to Anarchists    &#8212; is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give    an appearance of solidity to pure wind. One cannot change this all in a moment,    but one can at least change one&#8217;s own habits, and from time to time one can    even, if one jeers loudly enough, send some worn-out and useless phrase &#8212; some    <em>jackboot, Achilles&#8217; heel, hotbed, melting pot, acid test, veritable inferno</em>,    or other lump of verbal refuse &#8212; into the dustbin, where it belongs.</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-5766882.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>The Berlin Wall</title><dc:creator>Sister Terry Bardagjy</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:51:11 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/11/9/the-berlin-wall.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:5750418</guid><description><![CDATA[<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="visibility: visible ! important;" src="http://www.spiegel.de/images/image-24939-galleryV9-bgfu.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1257830098831" alt="" width="644" height="429" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img style="visibility: visible ! important;" src="http://www.spiegel.de/fotostrecke/fotostrecke-48631-2.html?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1257801275802" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p>Twenty years ago, the Berlin Wall ceased it&#8217;s hold on the divide of Berlin. Widely considered the &#8220;day that changed the world,&#8221; the accidental release of the &#8220;imprisoned&#8221; East Germans from Soviet rule on Nov. 9, 1989 was a sign of the&nbsp; Soviet Union&#8217;s already weakened grasp on its reign.&nbsp;&nbsp; To the United States, it signaled the end of an era in which the US reign for superpower of the world was threatened by another confederation of states.&nbsp; As Americans, we are encouraged to think of today as a victory for capitalism, a victory for the West, a victory for the US.&nbsp; But in actuality, it&#8217;s naive to view international politics with the west and it&#8217;s ideology as its center.&nbsp; Behind the Cold War PR, the McCarthy trials, the &#8220;ich bin ein Berliner&#8221; speech, the wall needed to come down.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In the Yalta Conference after WW2, Stalin requested all of Germany&#8217;s industrial might. Some was transported to Moscow, but the majority was heavily concentrated in East Germany.&nbsp; East Germany received some of the most radical Russian policy, with conditions and regulations harsher than in other bloc countries.&nbsp; Every man and woman worked.&nbsp;&nbsp; The stores carried one type of clothing, one type of food, and there were two television channels.&nbsp; All was equal, all was muted. I could go on here, but you get the gist.</p>
<p>The fall of the Berlin Wall wasn&#8217;t about the victory of the west over the east, of capitalism over Russian communism.&nbsp; It was the liberation of a people who were forced into inhabiting a country which was not their own.&nbsp; People who, with one fateful conference, were swung away from their families only miles away and oriented towards Moscow.&nbsp;</p>
<p>After the accidental opening of the wall, many people migrated to the west, leaving family on both sides with a simple phone call;&nbsp; &#8220;I&#8217;m in the west, im alright&#8221; said one German woman, who would return to her native east in a few weeks, but this time of her own will.&nbsp; Suddenly East Germany had bananas, Coca Cola, and a picked wall, and almost a year later, in October of 1990, East Germany was no more.&nbsp;</p>
<p>Today, people have gathered all over the globe to celebrate the spark which lit the fire of revolutions across eastern Europe, the capsizing of a symbol that represented the opressive reign of the late Soviet Rule in the bloc countries.&nbsp; But let us remember that this is not a story of economic systems or tyrranies, but rather that of liberation and reunification.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-5750418.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>zombies!!</title><category>Current</category><category>zombies humans brains noms</category><dc:creator>Sister Rebecca Faulkner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 18:58:57 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/2009/11/6/zombies.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">354295:4899854:5720545</guid><description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><span class="full-image-inline ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://humansvszombies.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hvz_rules_overview_dudes.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1257534229780" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://humansvszombies.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/hvz_rules_safezone_toilet.png?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1257534255715" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Here we go.. next week is <a href="http://uga.hvzsource.com/index.php">Humans v Zombies UGA edition</a>.&nbsp; Get your nerf guns ready, kids!</p>
]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://www.phikappa.org/creative/rss-comments-entry-5720545.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>
